Wayah Insurance Group's 60th Birthday Celebration :: Friday, May 29th from 11am-2pm :: Food * Music * Games * Drawings :: click here for more info!

Click for Franklin, North Carolina Forecast

Opinion Letters

While visiting my grandsons recently, 11-year-old Sam announced he would vote for Romney because Michelle Obama was responsible for shrinking his school cafeteria cookies one-third in size.

After interrogations from the truth squad (me), with unfounded sources uncovered, I asked if he didn’t actually respect someone determined to improve kids’ health and problems of obesity. Answer: “yea, sorta” as he launched into a rap song and dance ... “Michelle shrunk our cookies ...” as I was pondering the various screwy reasons that move some adults to vote as they do.

How important is respect for the basic morality of those who supposedly run the show? Among other values, the Obama tough and high principled leadership has raised the dialogue that the economy and health of this country are dependent on a clean and moral environment. In four short years, our president, despite harsh political adversity, has tallied a heap of successes for the American people.


This is in response to the letter from Sandi Dotherow in the Sept. 27 edition of MCN. Ms. Dotherow’s letter repeats several myths and falsehoods about Social Security that float around on the internet. Based on these myths, she then attacks several Democratic presidents for, among other things, “taking away our freedoms,” and suggests we “not vote blindly” in the upcoming election. I would like to set the record straight.

Social Security was never a voluntary program as Ms. Dotherow claims President Roosevelt “promised,” nor could it have been. While in its early days the law applied to the occupations of only about half of wage earners, everyone employed in those job categories was always legally obligated to pay into the system – participation was not voluntary. Today, with rare exceptions (mostly state and local government employees who come under an alternative system) nearly all occupations come under the law.


No matter how it's rationalized, a recent Jim Davis political mailer yet again made a purposely misleading claim detailing Mr. John Snow's statements (and remarks he never made) as “attacks.”

Mr. Davis’ current letter writing defender, suggested he only “characterized this criticism as an attack.” Somehow “characterization” makes it acceptable to claim the “information” printed in the recent mailer is an “attack.” This is a disingenuous rationalization. A mistake? doubtful. Twisted rhetoric? A fib? No let's just call it what it is, - just another lie. Choosing another word, which changes the concept, intent and actual meaning, is indeed, lying.

The writer’s next statement attempts to demean and diminish Mr. Snow's valid response as “silly” and declares their choice of the descriptive word “attack” as “simply a subjective term.” Oh? Simply? How does this compute?


President Reagan famously once said, “There you go again!” I believe I uttered that same statement when I received Jim Davis’ most recent mailer. It’s long on sensation, but falls short of the truth. Once again, as this election draws near, these deceitful mailers have begun filling my mailbox.

It seems the Davis campaign is willing to spend a lot of outside money on mailers hoping people aren’t fact checking what they receive. One of their mailers was already debunked by The Macon County News as being misleading; they would know because it cited that very same newspaper as its source.


Page 142 of 237

Macon County News is now on:
Find the Macon County News on Facebook! and Find the Macon County News on twitter!
Facebook   Twitter