I’m going to be as “tacky” in my public response to Mr. Swanson as he was in his response to Ms. Abel.
This gentleman, in his attempt to kill a message, kills the messenger. This is not the first time, and seems his usual method. Confusing the issue is his forte’. But, to give credit where credit is due, he does respond quickly. Perhaps that’s why his diatribe shows little thought and clearly misunderstands the point of Ms. Abel's message.
She does not advocate, nor hint that she advocates “Higher Taxes, More Government, OR Less Freedom.”