Unfortunately, this ruling by the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals is demonstrative of the way injustice predominates our courts today.
Judge Wynn, speaking for the court’s decision, argued the First Amendment prohibits “restrictions distinguishing among different speakers, allowing speech by some and not by others … In this case, North Carolina seeks to do just that: privilege speech on one side of the hotly debated issue – reproductive choice – while silencing opposing views.”
Really? Where in the First Amendment does it mandate every viewpoint be allowed equal representation? If this is really the case, why is religious expression so stringently regulated and even disallowed in the schools? Why can’t Intelligent Design or Creationism be taught on human origins in our public schools? Why can’t we hang the Ten Commandments in our nation’s courtrooms? The pattern of the courts for several decades now has been to silence opposing viewpoints if those views don’t line-up with the prevailing liberal ideology of the day.